<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On a Personal Note</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcardno</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45330</link>
		<dc:creator>dcardno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;...in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only the ones that matter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.</i></p>
<p>Only the ones that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Kusleika</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45329</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Kusleika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45329</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still supporting 2003 - in fact I still use it daily.  I just wasn&#039;t going to install it on this machine along with 2007 (I was going to use VPC).  But that all changed last night.  I&#039;m doing some training next week and I&#039;ll need to show everything both ways.  That means Office 2003 and 2007 are now together.  And installed in reverse order.  I can&#039;t wait to see what trouble that brings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like the vhds suggestion, but that won&#039;t work for my training class.  I&#039;ll need to be able to switch back and forth instantly.  I will, however, try the vhds for all the other Office versions and operating systems used for testing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still supporting 2003 &#8211; in fact I still use it daily.  I just wasn&#8217;t going to install it on this machine along with 2007 (I was going to use VPC).  But that all changed last night.  I&#8217;m doing some training next week and I&#8217;ll need to show everything both ways.  That means Office 2003 and 2007 are now together.  And installed in reverse order.  I can&#8217;t wait to see what trouble that brings.</p>
<p>I like the vhds suggestion, but that won&#8217;t work for my training class.  I&#8217;ll need to be able to switch back and forth instantly.  I will, however, try the vhds for all the other Office versions and operating systems used for testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45328</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45328</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tushar Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45324</link>
		<dc:creator>Tushar Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Re. no support for 2003...you may not support 2003 or earlier but in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.  There are still some instances where 2007&#039;s macro recorder generates no code but 2003 will.  And, no, please don&#039;t ask me for specifics.  I don&#039;t keep track of this kind of information.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick,</p>
<p>Re. no support for 2003&#8230;you may not support 2003 or earlier but in some ways 2003 will support you better than 2007.  There are still some instances where 2007&#8242;s macro recorder generates no code but 2003 will.  And, no, please don&#8217;t ask me for specifics.  I don&#8217;t keep track of this kind of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tushar Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tushar Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope your knee gets better soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We may have talked about this before but have you considered Foldershare or its competitors?  Foldershare is now Windows Live Sync after its acquisition by Microsoft.  Rather than swap hard disks, or copying data via memory sticks, or sharing folders over a network, I have been using FS for some years now to sync files on multiple machines.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick,</p>
<p>Hope your knee gets better soon.</p>
<p>We may have talked about this before but have you considered Foldershare or its competitors?  Foldershare is now Windows Live Sync after its acquisition by Microsoft.  Rather than swap hard disks, or copying data via memory sticks, or sharing folders over a network, I have been using FS for some years now to sync files on multiple machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YS</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45254</link>
		<dc:creator>YS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to hear about your knee. Get well soon!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think building your own desktop is a great idea. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll ever stop doing that myself. Go for the Core i7s - It&#039;s pretty much amazing. I brought home some work from the office once, and one operation (involving a not-very-efficient but had-to-be-done formula) that took 15 minutes on a Pentium Prescott 640 was done in 3 seconds on the i7 920.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear about your knee. Get well soon!</p>
<p>I think building your own desktop is a great idea. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever stop doing that myself. Go for the Core i7s &#8211; It&#8217;s pretty much amazing. I brought home some work from the office once, and one operation (involving a not-very-efficient but had-to-be-done formula) that took 15 minutes on a Pentium Prescott 640 was done in 3 seconds on the i7 920.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t be bothered with building a computer or shopping for the best and brightest. We beat the crap out of our computers, so there&#039;s no sense in spending a lot for anything fancy. Computers are commodities now anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it&#039;s time to get a new one I start watching what Staples has on sale. When a decently loaded HP laptop shows up with a good price, that&#039;s what I get. Generally I pay around $700-800, which includes the 3 year extended service plan. One monitor replacement beyond the regular warranty pays for the plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why Staples? I&#039;ve bought computers there for over ten years, they&#039;ve supported their stuff, and I&#039;ve had good luck with their service techs. All I have to do is mutter a few choice phrases I&#039;ve picked up from MSDN magazine (I don&#039;t even need to understand what they mean), and they know enough to stop bullshitting me. Try that at Best Buy, when you&#039;re done buying their gold-plated CAT-5 cable. I spend enough at Staples (desk chairs, external HDs, modems, UPSs, extra monitors, whatever) that I&#039;m a premier customer. They make me feel the way I try to make my customers feel. (Do you want fries with that?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why HP? Why not? My first HP had Windows 98 on it, and it lasted ten years with hardly any issues. Two Compaq laptops were immersed in water when my daughter flooded the kitchen from the upstairs bath, and after two days under a high powered fan, both started right up, and both are still in use (they predate my consulting career, so they&#039;re over six years old).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I stick with what I know and what works. YMMV.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t be bothered with building a computer or shopping for the best and brightest. We beat the crap out of our computers, so there&#8217;s no sense in spending a lot for anything fancy. Computers are commodities now anyway.</p>
<p>When it&#8217;s time to get a new one I start watching what Staples has on sale. When a decently loaded HP laptop shows up with a good price, that&#8217;s what I get. Generally I pay around $700-800, which includes the 3 year extended service plan. One monitor replacement beyond the regular warranty pays for the plan.</p>
<p>Why Staples? I&#8217;ve bought computers there for over ten years, they&#8217;ve supported their stuff, and I&#8217;ve had good luck with their service techs. All I have to do is mutter a few choice phrases I&#8217;ve picked up from MSDN magazine (I don&#8217;t even need to understand what they mean), and they know enough to stop bullshitting me. Try that at Best Buy, when you&#8217;re done buying their gold-plated CAT-5 cable. I spend enough at Staples (desk chairs, external HDs, modems, UPSs, extra monitors, whatever) that I&#8217;m a premier customer. They make me feel the way I try to make my customers feel. (Do you want fries with that?)</p>
<p>Why HP? Why not? My first HP had Windows 98 on it, and it lasted ten years with hardly any issues. Two Compaq laptops were immersed in water when my daughter flooded the kitchen from the upstairs bath, and after two days under a high powered fan, both started right up, and both are still in use (they predate my consulting career, so they&#8217;re over six years old).</p>
<p>I stick with what I know and what works. YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45244</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45244</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a netbook - great for battery life at client sites, and for carrying around. Not so great for intense data pounding, as may be expected. I&#039;ll build another desktop sometime soon - it will be super  fast for processing - ok for graphics, you know the score. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good luck with the knee, in a past life I did research on knees and cartilage - seems a lifetime ago.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a netbook &#8211; great for battery life at client sites, and for carrying around. Not so great for intense data pounding, as may be expected. I&#8217;ll build another desktop sometime soon &#8211; it will be super  fast for processing &#8211; ok for graphics, you know the score. </p>
<p>Good luck with the knee, in a past life I did research on knees and cartilage &#8211; seems a lifetime ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45242</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The company I work at has gone through more 610/810 motherboards than carter has pills! It&#039;s primarily because of the video card going bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that the users would grasp the left and right side of the laptop when docking the laptop. This would arch the middle upwards and take its toll on the graphics card.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I work at has gone through more 610/810 motherboards than carter has pills! It&#8217;s primarily because of the video card going bad.</p>
<p>It seems that the users would grasp the left and right side of the laptop when docking the laptop. This would arch the middle upwards and take its toll on the graphics card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ananda Sim</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2010/04/14/on-a-personal-note/#comment-45240</link>
		<dc:creator>Ananda Sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3767#comment-45240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Man, if you&#039;re using Windows 7, you&#039;ve got to wake up to alternate booting Windows 7 from .vhd. I don&#039;t mean Virtual PC (by the way, that&#039;s not what we call it in Windows 7) but .vhds - You create a .vhd, you create a boot entry, and you get a relevant edition of Windows 7 (licensing issues) install it inside the .vhd. When you reboot next, you will have more than one boot entry and you choose whichever one you want Office 2010, Office 2007, Office 2003. There is no hardware virtualisation except for disk access. You don&#039;t need heaps of memory nor do you need heaps of CPU power - you do need enough diskspace to hold several .vhds.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, if you&#8217;re using Windows 7, you&#8217;ve got to wake up to alternate booting Windows 7 from .vhd. I don&#8217;t mean Virtual PC (by the way, that&#8217;s not what we call it in Windows 7) but .vhds &#8211; You create a .vhd, you create a boot entry, and you get a relevant edition of Windows 7 (licensing issues) install it inside the .vhd. When you reboot next, you will have more than one boot entry and you choose whichever one you want Office 2010, Office 2007, Office 2003. There is no hardware virtualisation except for disk access. You don&#8217;t need heaps of memory nor do you need heaps of CPU power &#8211; you do need enough diskspace to hold several .vhds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

