<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office Web Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terryd</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42349</link>
		<dc:creator>Terryd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am unable to download the Office 2010 Beta from the MS site (maybe something to do with my ISP proxy). Is there another way to download it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unable to download the Office 2010 Beta from the MS site (maybe something to do with my ISP proxy). Is there another way to download it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42333</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;
I blogged &quot;about&quot; OWA just over a year ago(!), wow, Tushar is bang on, in his assessment!&lt;br&gt;
There are a whole world of issues to consider about web office (woffice), the only one the average user needs to worry about is the performance, which in all the different forms I&#039;ve seen is horrific. V1, V2, V3, V4, yes, agree. But I think the issue with woffice is not only about the app, it about the band with. I think the future might see &quot;work&quot; done on the local client, and the data slaved from the cloud - unless something stellar happen with band with in the nect few years - like a 500% speed increase, and caching or paging or something.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/13/why-woffice-web-office-is-such-a-disappointment-to-me/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/13/why-woffice-web-office-is-such-a-disappointment-to-me/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
and&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/11/the-case-against-on-line-collaboration/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/11/the-case-against-on-line-collaboration/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
and&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/12/on-line-rubbish/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/12/on-line-rubbish/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I blogged &#8220;about&#8221; OWA just over a year ago(!), wow, Tushar is bang on, in his assessment!<br />
There are a whole world of issues to consider about web office (woffice), the only one the average user needs to worry about is the performance, which in all the different forms I&#8217;ve seen is horrific. V1, V2, V3, V4, yes, agree. But I think the issue with woffice is not only about the app, it about the band with. I think the future might see &#8220;work&#8221; done on the local client, and the data slaved from the cloud &#8211; unless something stellar happen with band with in the nect few years &#8211; like a 500% speed increase, and caching or paging or something.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/13/why-woffice-web-office-is-such-a-disappointment-to-me/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/13/why-woffice-web-office-is-such-a-disappointment-to-me/</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/11/the-case-against-on-line-collaboration/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/11/11/the-case-against-on-line-collaboration/</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/12/on-line-rubbish/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blog.methodsinexcel.co.uk/2008/03/12/on-line-rubbish/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cone</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tushar,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your post got me interested in finding out a little more about Office Web Apps (OWA).&lt;br&gt;
(thanks for the two links you posted)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And... you have to have Windows Server 2008 (decided to skip that one) or follow the nine step procedure here for home use...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/activating.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/activating.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now if there was someone out there with Office 2010 installed and&lt;br&gt;
a Windows Live ID that was interested in editing my list of Pet names then&lt;br&gt;
maybe I would give it a go. [grin]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tushar,</p>
<p>Your post got me interested in finding out a little more about Office Web Apps (OWA).<br />
(thanks for the two links you posted)</p>
<p>And&#8230; you have to have Windows Server 2008 (decided to skip that one) or follow the nine step procedure here for home use&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/activating.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/activating.aspx</a></p>
<p>Now if there was someone out there with Office 2010 installed and<br />
a Windows Live ID that was interested in editing my list of Pet names then<br />
maybe I would give it a go. [grin]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tushar Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tushar Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42311</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;13 comments and not one about Office Web Apps.  Guess it shows how enthusiastic people are about the product. {grin}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I won&#039;t be trying out OWA.  I invested enormous resources in OWC - Office Web Components (released with Office 2000 and 2002 - or was it 2002 and 2003?) only to have all my investment go to waste.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe, OWA will be better than OWC but I will wait and see.  As of now...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) OWA is an online companion to O2010. Office Web Apps Overview (http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/overview.aspx) states &quot;You must install the Microsoft Office 2010 before using Office Web Apps. Install it today, and then get started using your Office Web Apps.&quot; and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Microsoft Office Web Apps (Beta) (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=27d81b1c-18ae-4983-8e1c-224bb747eb99&amp;displaylang=en&amp;lc=1033) states &quot;Office Web Apps enable you to view, &lt;b&gt;do light editing...&lt;/b&gt;&quot; (emphasis added)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, so from a professional perspective, if I have to have O2010 on my machine and can do only light editing in OWA, why would I want to use the latter?  Real-time collaboration of relatively simple documents?  My clients don&#039;t hire me for that!  They hire me for high-end work -- with a sprinkling of the impossible.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And,from a personal perspective, Google docs is more than adequate for sharing documents with family and friends.  Don&#039;t have to worry about which -- if any -- version of Office they have on their machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, where OWA is concerned, yes, it&#039;s possible I will be singing its praises some time in the future, but that time is definitely not now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13 comments and not one about Office Web Apps.  Guess it shows how enthusiastic people are about the product. {grin}</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be trying out OWA.  I invested enormous resources in OWC &#8211; Office Web Components (released with Office 2000 and 2002 &#8211; or was it 2002 and 2003?) only to have all my investment go to waste.</p>
<p>Maybe, OWA will be better than OWC but I will wait and see.  As of now&#8230;</p>
<p>(1) OWA is an online companion to O2010. Office Web Apps Overview (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/overview.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/office-web-apps/overview.aspx</a>) states &#8220;You must install the Microsoft Office 2010 before using Office Web Apps. Install it today, and then get started using your Office Web Apps.&#8221; and </p>
<p>(2) Microsoft Office Web Apps (Beta) (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=27d81b1c-18ae-4983-8e1c-224bb747eb99&#038;displaylang=en&#038;lc=1033" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=27d81b1c-18ae-4983-8e1c-224bb747eb99&#038;displaylang=en&#038;lc=1033</a>) states &#8220;Office Web Apps enable you to view, <b>do light editing&#8230;</b>&#8221; (emphasis added)</p>
<p>OK, so from a professional perspective, if I have to have O2010 on my machine and can do only light editing in OWA, why would I want to use the latter?  Real-time collaboration of relatively simple documents?  My clients don&#8217;t hire me for that!  They hire me for high-end work &#8212; with a sprinkling of the impossible.  </p>
<p>And,from a personal perspective, Google docs is more than adequate for sharing documents with family and friends.  Don&#8217;t have to worry about which &#8212; if any &#8212; version of Office they have on their machine.</p>
<p>So, where OWA is concerned, yes, it&#8217;s possible I will be singing its praises some time in the future, but that time is definitely not now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdH</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42309</link>
		<dc:creator>EdH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42309</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@bob - yeah, i have to be careful with sumifs() in files sent to 2003 users. Not sure your issue with months. I use month/period comparisons in nearly 100% of my sumifs. It is all financial and sales data.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bob &#8211; yeah, i have to be careful with sumifs() in files sent to 2003 users. Not sure your issue with months. I use month/period comparisons in nearly 100% of my sumifs. It is all financial and sales data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Idris - in -cell charting, come on they are a shambles &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.datadrivenconsulting.com/2009/11/excel-in-cell-bar-charts.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.datadrivenconsulting.com/2009/11/excel-in-cell-bar-charts.html&lt;/a&gt;. Although they are improved in 2010, as the article states, how did they get it so wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Idris &#8211; in -cell charting, come on they are a shambles <a href="http://blog.datadrivenconsulting.com/2009/11/excel-in-cell-bar-charts.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.datadrivenconsulting.com/2009/11/excel-in-cell-bar-charts.html</a>. Although they are improved in 2010, as the article states, how did they get it so wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42307</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@EdH, SUMIFS are nigh-on useless IMO. Firstly, they are not backward compatible, but try comparing the Month of a range against a given month number with SUMIFS? Unfortunately, those SUMPRODUCT hacks as you call will continue to rule the roost.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@EdH, SUMIFS are nigh-on useless IMO. Firstly, they are not backward compatible, but try comparing the Month of a range against a given month number with SUMIFS? Unfortunately, those SUMPRODUCT hacks as you call will continue to rule the roost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdH</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42305</link>
		<dc:creator>EdH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jon, sweet! hadn&#039;t tried that. I will move Macros somwhre else because being on the View tab is just ridiculious.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, sweet! hadn&#8217;t tried that. I will move Macros somwhre else because being on the View tab is just ridiculious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42304</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for blogging this, I immediately went and downloaded it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My first impression is very positive. Finally I can double-click on chart axes again to change their properties! Excel 2010 seems to be much faster than 2007 (running on a Core 2 Duo T9300 with 4 GB RAM and dedicated graphics).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Furthermore I get the impression that my addin works faster, too -- nice!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am a scientist and was very intrigued to see that they did worked on some formulas. Unfortunately, at this point the link in the help file does not work, so I don&#039;t know which formulas they improved and how.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for blogging this, I immediately went and downloaded it.</p>
<p>My first impression is very positive. Finally I can double-click on chart axes again to change their properties! Excel 2010 seems to be much faster than 2007 (running on a Core 2 Duo T9300 with 4 GB RAM and dedicated graphics).</p>
<p>Furthermore I get the impression that my addin works faster, too &#8212; nice!</p>
<p>I am a scientist and was very intrigued to see that they did worked on some formulas. Unfortunately, at this point the link in the help file does not work, so I don&#8217;t know which formulas they improved and how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/11/20/office-web-apps/#comment-42303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=3276#comment-42303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;EdH - The nice thing about the 2010 ribbon is that you&#039;re not stuck with whatever some genius decided to put on each tab. They&#039;ve built in the capability to customize your ribbon tabs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EdH &#8211; The nice thing about the 2010 ribbon is that you&#8217;re not stuck with whatever some genius decided to put on each tab. They&#8217;ve built in the capability to customize your ribbon tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

