<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2007 SP2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39293</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bob - that&#039;s strange, I have found 2007 more stable than previous versions, especially with very large files.  The only problem I had was with one file that had crashed ocaisionally in previous versions, but in 2007 crashed instantly on start up.  I tracked that down to an incorectly dimensioned array in a UDF, and after I fixed that it was no trouble at all, so I can&#039;t really blame Excel for that one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just noticed you referred to the system hanging up.  Do you have Google Tool Bar installed?  XL2007 had an issue with this which made deletion of large ranges very slow; often so slow the system appeared to have hung up.  Possibly that was your problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be interested to hear the experience of others; in particular has anyonbe found any evidence of the claimed performanance improvements?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; that&#8217;s strange, I have found 2007 more stable than previous versions, especially with very large files.  The only problem I had was with one file that had crashed ocaisionally in previous versions, but in 2007 crashed instantly on start up.  I tracked that down to an incorectly dimensioned array in a UDF, and after I fixed that it was no trouble at all, so I can&#8217;t really blame Excel for that one.</p>
<p>Just noticed you referred to the system hanging up.  Do you have Google Tool Bar installed?  XL2007 had an issue with this which made deletion of large ranges very slow; often so slow the system appeared to have hung up.  Possibly that was your problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to hear the experience of others; in particular has anyonbe found any evidence of the claimed performanance improvements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lalonde</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39288</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lalonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I response to Doug J&#039;s comment about being underwhelmed by SP2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was building a reporting dashboard with gantt charts and finance tables. Installing SP2 saved the project because Excel 2007 is very unstable. I was running SP1 on a powerful laptop with 2 gigs ram and it was poor and crashed often.&lt;br&gt;
I tried saving as xlsb and xlsm formats and both were just as likely to hang up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SP2 has only clobbered an activex listbox, but has otherwise been acceptable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I response to Doug J&#8217;s comment about being underwhelmed by SP2.</p>
<p>I was building a reporting dashboard with gantt charts and finance tables. Installing SP2 saved the project because Excel 2007 is very unstable. I was running SP1 on a powerful laptop with 2 gigs ram and it was poor and crashed often.<br />
I tried saving as xlsb and xlsm formats and both were just as likely to hang up.</p>
<p>SP2 has only clobbered an activex listbox, but has otherwise been acceptable.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Kusleika</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39277</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Kusleika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2007/06/06/subtracting-binary-fractions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2007/06/06/subtracting-binary-fractions/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a walk through of the imprecision.  And to be fair, computers can be precise, but it&#039;s a trade off between speed and accuracy.  However, I agree it &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; a pain when you just want a Balance Sheet that balances. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2007/06/06/subtracting-binary-fractions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2007/06/06/subtracting-binary-fractions/</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a walk through of the imprecision.  And to be fair, computers can be precise, but it&#8217;s a trade off between speed and accuracy.  However, I agree it <b>is</b> a pain when you just want a Balance Sheet that balances. <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39259</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim - if you need to get an exact balance, and you are working with money (i.e. you need 2 decimal places) you can apply the ROUND() function to any values you want to balance, or just format to 2 decimal places.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand if you really need more than 15 digits precision, you need a different tool.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; if you need to get an exact balance, and you are working with money (i.e. you need 2 decimal places) you can apply the ROUND() function to any values you want to balance, or just format to 2 decimal places.</p>
<p>On the other hand if you really need more than 15 digits precision, you need a different tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boggs</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39250</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I jumped the gun there. Not a problem specific to SP2 or Excel 2007, just never realized it before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/78113&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/78113&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that as advanced as computers are, you can end up with in inexact result on a very simple additon problem. Nature of the beast.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jumped the gun there. Not a problem specific to SP2 or Excel 2007, just never realized it before.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/78113" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/78113</a></p>
<p>It is interesting that as advanced as computers are, you can end up with in inexact result on a very simple additon problem. Nature of the beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boggs</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39246</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a simple formula in cell e2:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;=+a2+b2+c2+d2? or &quot;=sum(a2:d2)&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The format has 20 decimal places and values are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a2 = -2048.01&lt;br&gt;
b2 = 1&lt;br&gt;
c2 = 2048.02&lt;br&gt;
d2 = -1&lt;br&gt;
e2 (the result of the formula) = 0.00999999999976353&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have played with this quite a bit. It appears that if you add a positive&lt;br&gt;
and a negative number with a decimal and the result is within 100+/-, you&lt;br&gt;
start getting the calculation error. I have tried this on XP, Vista and&lt;br&gt;
Windows 7. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, this works:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2048.01) + 1948.01 = 100&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2048.01) + 1949.01 = -99.0000000000002&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is really bad for all accountants trying to balance a work sheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know if there is already a patch for SP2?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a simple formula in cell e2:</p>
<p>&#8220;=+a2+b2+c2+d2? or &#8220;=sum(a2:d2)&#8221;</p>
<p>The format has 20 decimal places and values are as follows:</p>
<p>a2 = -2048.01<br />
b2 = 1<br />
c2 = 2048.02<br />
d2 = -1<br />
e2 (the result of the formula) = 0.00999999999976353</p>
<p>I have played with this quite a bit. It appears that if you add a positive<br />
and a negative number with a decimal and the result is within 100+/-, you<br />
start getting the calculation error. I have tried this on XP, Vista and<br />
Windows 7. </p>
<p>So, this works:</p>
<p>(2048.01) + 1948.01 = 100</p>
<p>but</p>
<p>(2048.01) + 1949.01 = -99.0000000000002</p>
<p>This is really bad for all accountants trying to balance a work sheet.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if there is already a patch for SP2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39189</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Downloaded and installed SP2 yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pretty underwhelmed so far. If the redrawing time for complex drawings has been improved it isn&#039;t only a marginal improvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone else found any worthwhile changes?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloaded and installed SP2 yesterday.</p>
<p>Pretty underwhelmed so far. If the redrawing time for complex drawings has been improved it isn&#8217;t only a marginal improvement.</p>
<p>Anyone else found any worthwhile changes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ken -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excel is the charting engine for Word and PowerPoint, with Excel charts contained/embedded in Word or PowerPoint shapes (as they are contained in Excel shapes in Excel). In the rush to sweep the debris, I mean the product, out the door, the embedded Excel chart objects were never hooked up with the VBA object model, so they could not be manipulated programmatically. You would have to say that adding the charting OM to PowerPoint and Word is an important bug fix for all three applications. I wouldn&#039;t call it an improvement, since the lack of OM was truly a deficiency, on par with the lack of the macro recording capability.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken -</p>
<p>Excel is the charting engine for Word and PowerPoint, with Excel charts contained/embedded in Word or PowerPoint shapes (as they are contained in Excel shapes in Excel). In the rush to sweep the debris, I mean the product, out the door, the embedded Excel chart objects were never hooked up with the VBA object model, so they could not be manipulated programmatically. You would have to say that adding the charting OM to PowerPoint and Word is an important bug fix for all three applications. I wouldn&#8217;t call it an improvement, since the lack of OM was truly a deficiency, on par with the lack of the macro recording capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Glancy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39049</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Glancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Doug, I think &quot;targeted&quot; is used there as an adjective.  In other words, the performance improvements are not willy-nilly or scattershot, but rather limited and laser-like.  I hope that lifts your spirits :).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I think &#8220;targeted&#8221; is used there as an adjective.  In other words, the performance improvements are not willy-nilly or scattershot, but rather limited and laser-like.  I hope that lifts your spirits <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/04/19/office-2007-sp2/#comment-39031</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2353#comment-39031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;A chart object model has been added to Word and PowerPoint.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well I had hoped that SP2 might bring some improvements for the chart object model *in* Excel VBA. But if they managed to get rid of some of the bugs in the charting engine, that would be great too. (Not that there is too much to complain about: Excel 2007&#039;s charting engine play in an entirely different league than its predecessors of course.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A chart object model has been added to Word and PowerPoint.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well I had hoped that SP2 might bring some improvements for the chart object model *in* Excel VBA. But if they managed to get rid of some of the bugs in the charting engine, that would be great too. (Not that there is too much to complain about: Excel 2007&#8242;s charting engine play in an entirely different league than its predecessors of course.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

