<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excel multi-threading calculations on 8 processors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcardno</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/#comment-38586</link>
		<dc:creator>dcardno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2261#comment-38586</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;They are all procesing at the same time....&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, but most of the processing seems to be kernel (red), not application (green) cycles.  I am not sure what kernel activities might have been loading the processors, but suspect that most of the application work was completed by the first, second, and seventh (from the left) CPUs, with a very little amount by the sixth, and probably in the last interval after the three peaks that are common to all processors...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They are all procesing at the same time&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but most of the processing seems to be kernel (red), not application (green) cycles.  I am not sure what kernel activities might have been loading the processors, but suspect that most of the application work was completed by the first, second, and seventh (from the left) CPUs, with a very little amount by the sixth, and probably in the last interval after the three peaks that are common to all processors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/#comment-38576</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2261#comment-38576</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They are all procesing at the same time. Peaks and valleys match on all 8 procesors. Not very efficient not too mention bad use of capacity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are all procesing at the same time. Peaks and valleys match on all 8 procesors. Not very efficient not too mention bad use of capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/#comment-38569</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2261#comment-38569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Karl,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excel 2007 has a multi-threaded calculation engine which splits the calculation chain into multiple threads and allocates to the available cores.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but everything else in Excel (including VBA) is still single-threaded.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl,</p>
<p>Excel 2007 has a multi-threaded calculation engine which splits the calculation chain into multiple threads and allocates to the available cores.</p>
<p>but everything else in Excel (including VBA) is still single-threaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/#comment-38561</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2261#comment-38561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Multi-threading is the future of high performance computing, since CPU makers threw the towel at Moore&#039;s Law. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What always strike me as creepy is that there are some Excel users who really think they have a high performance computational tool in their hands. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, what you see is not multi-threading. It&#039;s nothing but ONE thread being distributed into your 8 cores.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once again, if you want speed and reliability, leave Excel for a serious program. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;
Karl&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multi-threading is the future of high performance computing, since CPU makers threw the towel at Moore&#8217;s Law. </p>
<p>What always strike me as creepy is that there are some Excel users who really think they have a high performance computational tool in their hands. </p>
<p>No, what you see is not multi-threading. It&#8217;s nothing but ONE thread being distributed into your 8 cores.</p>
<p>Once again, if you want speed and reliability, leave Excel for a serious program. </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Karel Pieterse</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2009/03/19/excel-multi-threading-calculations-on-8-processors/#comment-38559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Karel Pieterse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=2261#comment-38559</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like quite a machine, Tushar!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like quite a machine, Tushar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

