<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Excel for Old Guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-40015</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-40015</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re Office Labs&#039;s Search Commands - &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn&#039;t play well with some of my other Excel AddIns - a fact that&#039;s reported in the blog on Search Commands - but apparently works fine with Word and PowerPoint.  The symptoms are that once installed, Search Commands disappears when Excel is closed and re-opened.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, if you add some Workbook_Open code to set the appropriate COMAddin.Connect first to False and then to True, it&#039;s available (at least for workbooks that have that code).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s claimed that Search Commands can work with voice recognition - to wit:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob gave me a cool demo  he was using Word said &quot;Search Commands Background&quot; and magically Search Commands found all background related commands and then he said &quot;2? to launch the add shading option. Nifty! How did he do it? Rob has created a speech macro (aka speech magic) to enable voice with Search Commands.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&#039;s probably out of my zone of interest.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.officelabs.com/projects/searchcommands/Pages/default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.officelabs.com/projects/searchcommands/Pages/default.aspx&lt;/a&gt; for more, if you already haven&#039;t gotten at least reasonably familiar with the Excel Ribbon&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Office Labs&#8217;s Search Commands &#8211; </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t play well with some of my other Excel AddIns &#8211; a fact that&#8217;s reported in the blog on Search Commands &#8211; but apparently works fine with Word and PowerPoint.  The symptoms are that once installed, Search Commands disappears when Excel is closed and re-opened.  </p>
<p>However, if you add some Workbook_Open code to set the appropriate COMAddin.Connect first to False and then to True, it&#8217;s available (at least for workbooks that have that code).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s claimed that Search Commands can work with voice recognition &#8211; to wit:</p>
<p>Rob gave me a cool demo  he was using Word said &#8220;Search Commands Background&#8221; and magically Search Commands found all background related commands and then he said &#8220;2? to launch the add shading option. Nifty! How did he do it? Rob has created a speech macro (aka speech magic) to enable voice with Search Commands.  </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s probably out of my zone of interest.  See <a href="http://www.officelabs.com/projects/searchcommands/Pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.officelabs.com/projects/searchcommands/Pages/default.aspx</a> for more, if you already haven&#8217;t gotten at least reasonably familiar with the Excel Ribbon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick O'Beirne</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-32080</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick O'Beirne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-32080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.builderau.com.au/news/print.htm?TYPE=story&amp;AT=339288481-339028227t-320000982c&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.builderau.com.au/news/print.htm?TYPE=story&amp;AT=339288481-339028227t-320000982c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft lets users bypass Office Ribbon&lt;br&gt;
Ina Fried - 2008/04/29 08:03:01&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/Microsoft-lets-users-bypass-Office-Ribbon/0,339028227,339288481,00.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/Microsoft-lets-users-bypass-Office-Ribbon/0,339028227,339288481,00.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For users still unhappy using the Ribbon interface in the Office productivity suite, Microsoft has a new option: search.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday, the company released an Office add-on called Search Commands that lets users type the function they are looking to do. After months of testing it internally, Microsoft is ready to give the public a chance to try it out. But the new tool won&#039;t be found on Microsoft&#039;s main Web site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather, it will be available via a new effort, dubbed Office Labs. Spearheaded by Microsoft veteran Chris Pratley, Office Labs is Microsoft&#039;s attempt to test out productivity ideas that may -- or may not -- be ready for prime time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.builderau.com.au/news/print.htm?TYPE=story&amp;AT=339288481-339028227t-320000982c" rel="nofollow">http://www.builderau.com.au/news/print.htm?TYPE=story&#038;AT=339288481-339028227t-320000982c</a></p>
<p>Microsoft lets users bypass Office Ribbon<br />
Ina Fried &#8211; 2008/04/29 08:03:01</p>
<p><a href="http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/Microsoft-lets-users-bypass-Office-Ribbon/0,339028227,339288481,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/Microsoft-lets-users-bypass-Office-Ribbon/0,339028227,339288481,00.htm</a></p>
<p>For users still unhappy using the Ribbon interface in the Office productivity suite, Microsoft has a new option: search.</p>
<p>On Monday, the company released an Office add-on called Search Commands that lets users type the function they are looking to do. After months of testing it internally, Microsoft is ready to give the public a chance to try it out. But the new tool won&#8217;t be found on Microsoft&#8217;s main Web site.</p>
<p>Rather, it will be available via a new effort, dubbed Office Labs. Spearheaded by Microsoft veteran Chris Pratley, Office Labs is Microsoft&#8217;s attempt to test out productivity ideas that may &#8212; or may not &#8212; be ready for prime time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Henson</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-31182</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Henson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-31182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a quick-and-dirty way to let users control Excel 2007 through a menu: add to the menu that appears when you right-click a sheet tab. The menu itself is CommandBar(42), also known as the Ply menu, at least in English. In my current project I simply test the version, and the project&#039;s menu goes to the Ply menu under Excel 12 of the Worksheet menu under Excel 11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not an ideal solution, but I am working on an Excel 2003 machine at work with limited opportunities to test on 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a quick-and-dirty way to let users control Excel 2007 through a menu: add to the menu that appears when you right-click a sheet tab. The menu itself is CommandBar(42), also known as the Ply menu, at least in English. In my current project I simply test the version, and the project&#8217;s menu goes to the Ply menu under Excel 12 of the Worksheet menu under Excel 11.</p>
<p>This is not an ideal solution, but I am working on an Excel 2003 machine at work with limited opportunities to test on 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick O'Beirne</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30922</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick O'Beirne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just had a look at John Walkenbach&#039;s Excel 2007 Bible.&lt;br&gt;
It&#039;s a good introduction, probably better for people starting new with Excel 2007 than converting from earlier versions.&lt;br&gt;
I noticed that his dialog screenshots were in a colourful 2007 style whereas my Excel 2007 dialogs look just like the grey old ones.&lt;br&gt;
It&#039;s because for speed I have the Personalization option in Vista set to &quot;Windows Standard&quot; rather than Vista or Aero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And btw on the last page he offers PUP for only $9.95 to readers! A giveaway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had a look at John Walkenbach&#8217;s Excel 2007 Bible.<br />
It&#8217;s a good introduction, probably better for people starting new with Excel 2007 than converting from earlier versions.<br />
I noticed that his dialog screenshots were in a colourful 2007 style whereas my Excel 2007 dialogs look just like the grey old ones.<br />
It&#8217;s because for speed I have the Personalization option in Vista set to &#8220;Windows Standard&#8221; rather than Vista or Aero.</p>
<p>And btw on the last page he offers PUP for only $9.95 to readers! A giveaway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I rember when people used to come up to me, back in 2006, and say hey Ross, I hate this standard looking IU, I just cant use it!&lt;br&gt;
(what I really need is some sort of UI where I can only get at the things which are grouped togther and might migrate well to a web app.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not anymore! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rember when people used to come up to me, back in 2006, and say hey Ross, I hate this standard looking IU, I just cant use it!<br />
(what I really need is some sort of UI where I can only get at the things which are grouped togther and might migrate well to a web app.)</p>
<p>Not anymore! <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Broad</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Broad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had to use the new interface when a user using some of my spreadsheets was asking me to do certain things and he had the new office.   Man, was that a frustrating experience (and humbling too).   Being one of the fastest key board users around - I was prevented from getting even the simplest of tasks done and felt like a fool.   I finally just threw up my hands and got the user to do the work under my direction.   I have just taken the plunge and installed it on my laptop and will be forced to have to come to grips with the Microsoft &quot;vision&quot; of how the UI should be.  I imagine it will be similar to the migration from pre-VBA macro code to VBA - which, at that time, was a personally very frustrating experience.   But I think a concerted two days of &quot;drilling&quot; in the new approaches will be mainly what it takes.   I have not touched the programmability as yet.   In general, it&#039;s a real dud.  Who on earth at Microsoft could possibly think that this was the way users would want to work.  Someone&#039;s got their head in the clouds (or perhaps I mean in a hole in the ground or some other more nefarious and smelly location).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to use the new interface when a user using some of my spreadsheets was asking me to do certain things and he had the new office.   Man, was that a frustrating experience (and humbling too).   Being one of the fastest key board users around &#8211; I was prevented from getting even the simplest of tasks done and felt like a fool.   I finally just threw up my hands and got the user to do the work under my direction.   I have just taken the plunge and installed it on my laptop and will be forced to have to come to grips with the Microsoft &#8220;vision&#8221; of how the UI should be.  I imagine it will be similar to the migration from pre-VBA macro code to VBA &#8211; which, at that time, was a personally very frustrating experience.   But I think a concerted two days of &#8220;drilling&#8221; in the new approaches will be mainly what it takes.   I have not touched the programmability as yet.   In general, it&#8217;s a real dud.  Who on earth at Microsoft could possibly think that this was the way users would want to work.  Someone&#8217;s got their head in the clouds (or perhaps I mean in a hole in the ground or some other more nefarious and smelly location).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Ellenberger</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30746</link>
		<dc:creator>J Ellenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The relevant point was made&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is   but the question remains whether the ribbon provides enough benefit to overcome that cost. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any new command process requires relearning and is therefore a cost.&lt;br&gt;
Presumably there is an offsetting benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In several cases I have not found that to be true and there fore noted that the emperor had no clothes and stayed with the older version I do not have time to play for no benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relevant point was made</p>
<p>it is   but the question remains whether the ribbon provides enough benefit to overcome that cost. </p>
<p>Any new command process requires relearning and is therefore a cost.<br />
Presumably there is an offsetting benefit.</p>
<p>In several cases I have not found that to be true and there fore noted that the emperor had no clothes and stayed with the older version I do not have time to play for no benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hui...</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30738</link>
		<dc:creator>Hui...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The world was going to end after Dos 3.3...&lt;br&gt;
It Didn&#039;t, we adapt and survive&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world was going to end after Dos 3.3&#8230;<br />
It Didn&#8217;t, we adapt and survive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30730</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;fzz - great analogy. Yes MS can, and do admit mistakes (eg SP3), although no one is doing that for the effluent UI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dick - I thought that was a milder rant. Interesting point on the keyboarding improvements. Most reports also suggest inexperienced users cope ok with the ribbon too. I guess that leaves a middle ground of folks that kinda knew where most stuff was in 2003 but didn&#039;t know the kb shortcut, these probably feel the most pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not convinced that a UI that is OK because it is easy to make it go away could be classed as a triumph of user experience engineering. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ditto on the paste button and button size, I can&#039;t see any sense in them being bigger than normal cell size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think needing to &#039;ease into&#039; the latest version of a program I have been working in for years and years represents a massive user experience Fail. You are right though, and I think that is where I went wrong, I thought I would &#039;just make sure&#039; all my free add-ins worked fine with a beta of 2007. None of them did, and I couldn&#039;t find any useful commands to work out why. That was a rant believe me!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fzz &#8211; great analogy. Yes MS can, and do admit mistakes (eg SP3), although no one is doing that for the effluent UI.</p>
<p>Dick &#8211; I thought that was a milder rant. Interesting point on the keyboarding improvements. Most reports also suggest inexperienced users cope ok with the ribbon too. I guess that leaves a middle ground of folks that kinda knew where most stuff was in 2003 but didn&#8217;t know the kb shortcut, these probably feel the most pain.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that a UI that is OK because it is easy to make it go away could be classed as a triumph of user experience engineering. </p>
<p>Ditto on the paste button and button size, I can&#8217;t see any sense in them being bigger than normal cell size.</p>
<p>I think needing to &#8216;ease into&#8217; the latest version of a program I have been working in for years and years represents a massive user experience Fail. You are right though, and I think that is where I went wrong, I thought I would &#8216;just make sure&#8217; all my free add-ins worked fine with a beta of 2007. None of them did, and I couldn&#8217;t find any useful commands to work out why. That was a rant believe me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wallentin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2008/02/14/new-excel-for-old-guys/#comment-30718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wallentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1811#comment-30718</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A deeper review of the book can be found here:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/ribbonx-customizing-the-office-2007-ribbon-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/ribbonx-customizing-the-office-2007-ribbon-review/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;
Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A deeper review of the book can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/ribbonx-customizing-the-office-2007-ribbon-review/" rel="nofollow">http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/ribbonx-customizing-the-office-2007-ribbon-review/</a></p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

