<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating and deploying Managed COM add-ins with VB.NET 2005 &#8211; Part IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: XL-Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20615</link>
		<dc:creator>XL-Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20615</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ross,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with VBA it&#039;s a total different &#039;world&#039; which is also true to some extend when it comes to classic VB. I&#039;ve never said that .NET stuff is simple...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my opinion the MSDN articles I refer to (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/16/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-vi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/16/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-vi/&lt;/a&gt;) are good although they don&#039;t describe how to put the generated standard COM DLL and the &#039;shimmed&#039; managed COM add-in into an installation package. The later will be subject for an additional post by me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;
Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross,</p>
<p>Compared with VBA it&#8217;s a total different &#8216;world&#8217; which is also true to some extend when it comes to classic VB. I&#8217;ve never said that .NET stuff is simple&#8230;</p>
<p>In my opinion the MSDN articles I refer to (see <a href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/16/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-vi/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/16/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-vi/</a>) are good although they don&#8217;t describe how to put the generated standard COM DLL and the &#8216;shimmed&#8217; managed COM add-in into an installation package. The later will be subject for an additional post by me.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Methods In Excel » Free VS2005 - [trial]</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20613</link>
		<dc:creator>Methods In Excel » Free VS2005 - [trial]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20613</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] If you&#039;ve been following xlDennis&#039; excellent set of post over at DDOE then you might be tempempted to try your hand at a .Net managed code addin. If you do, this might be of intrest to you: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;ve been following xlDennis&#8217; excellent set of post over at DDOE then you might be tempempted to try your hand at a .Net managed code addin. If you do, this might be of intrest to you: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20610</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dennis, Mike, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I intend to download the trail of VS2005 pro, and set aside some time to follow your instructions,&lt;br&gt;
I am looking forward to the shim section, I&#039;ve never been able to understand this!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, Mike, </p>
<p>I intend to download the trail of VS2005 pro, and set aside some time to follow your instructions,<br />
I am looking forward to the shim section, I&#8217;ve never been able to understand this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XL-Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20596</link>
		<dc:creator>XL-Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20596</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mike,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for Your kind comment :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From what I can understand it looks like we:&lt;br&gt;
- For 2000 to 2003 will still need to use a &#039;shimmed&#039; DLL *if* we use the .NET platform while&lt;br&gt;
- For 2007 and forward it will rely on manifest which does not require any shimming at all.&lt;br&gt;
  (If I understand it correctly this is already an approach when it comes to MS Outlook).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Usually MSFT don&#039;t give anything for free so I guess that by making it available for free they hope that more developers will find their way to the .NET platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;
Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Many thanks for Your kind comment <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From what I can understand it looks like we:<br />
- For 2000 to 2003 will still need to use a &#8216;shimmed&#8217; DLL *if* we use the .NET platform while<br />
- For 2007 and forward it will rely on manifest which does not require any shimming at all.<br />
  (If I understand it correctly this is already an approach when it comes to MS Outlook).</p>
<p>Usually MSFT don&#8217;t give anything for free so I guess that by making it available for free they hope that more developers will find their way to the .NET platform.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rosenblum</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rosenblum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very, very nice work Dennis, a really impressive amount of detail. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ross, that is an excellent link. (And the official announcement, here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=459132&amp;SiteID=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=459132&amp;SiteID=1&lt;/a&gt;) This &quot;Cypress&quot; VS 2005 add-on does sound very promising. Might this finally be our easy-to-deploy shim for Office? We&#039;ll have to wait and see, I suppose...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very nice work Dennis, a really impressive amount of detail. <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ross, that is an excellent link. (And the official announcement, here: <a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=459132&amp;SiteID=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=459132&#038;SiteID=1</a>) This &#8220;Cypress&#8221; VS 2005 add-on does sound very promising. Might this finally be our easy-to-deploy shim for Office? We&#8217;ll have to wait and see, I suppose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XL-Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20589</link>
		<dc:creator>XL-Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20589</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ross,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the URL and Your kind comment :) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&gt;Sure looks like .net needs a lot of work to get it up and running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, and it will be even more complicated when we add additional technical information when it comes to deployment and codesigning. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope You and other visitors can maintain the interest as I will in the end compare VB.NET with VB 6.0 when it comes to COM add-ins where I hope I can present some guidelines. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The folling list shows the headlines for remaining post on the subject:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. NotesTool  Functions&lt;br&gt;
2. Com Shim Wizard&lt;br&gt;
3. Security (Strong names and CodeSigning)&lt;br&gt;
4. Deployment&lt;br&gt;
5. VB 6.0 vs VB.NET 2005  Creating &amp; Deploying COM add-ins&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;
Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross,</p>
<p>Thanks for the URL and Your kind comment <img src='http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>&gt;Sure looks like .net needs a lot of work to get it up and running.</p>
<p>Yes, and it will be even more complicated when we add additional technical information when it comes to deployment and codesigning. </p>
<p>I hope You and other visitors can maintain the interest as I will in the end compare VB.NET with VB 6.0 when it comes to COM add-ins where I hope I can present some guidelines. </p>
<p>The folling list shows the headlines for remaining post on the subject:</p>
<p>1. NotesTool  Functions<br />
2. Com Shim Wizard<br />
3. Security (Strong names and CodeSigning)<br />
4. Deployment<br />
5. VB 6.0 vs VB.NET 2005  Creating &amp; Deploying COM add-ins</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2006/08/14/creating-and-deploying-managed-com-add-ins-with-vbnet-2005-part-iv/#comment-20587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1470#comment-20587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent work Dennis thanks for the posts, I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll help a lot. I need to re-read the lot of them (a few times) to get a really good understanding! Sure looks like .net needs a lot of work to get it up and running. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you heard much about the new VS addin for makeing Office adding?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/kathleen/archive/2006/08/09/693474.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/kathleen/archive/2006/08/09/693474.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work Dennis thanks for the posts, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll help a lot. I need to re-read the lot of them (a few times) to get a really good understanding! Sure looks like .net needs a lot of work to get it up and running. </p>
<p>Have you heard much about the new VS addin for makeing Office adding?<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/kathleen/archive/2006/08/09/693474.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/kathleen/archive/2006/08/09/693474.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

