<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excel Formula Formatter &#8211; Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonu Singal</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-46218</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonu Singal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-46218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When Excel formula is being calculated, can pre-saved excel be opened?&lt;br&gt;
I am working with Excel UDF (written in C#, returns array result) which takes lot of time. When udf is running,I am not able to open any existing excel sheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to confirm, whether there is problem with my udf or excel behaviour is like this with all udfs (to maintain formula consistency)? Is this behaviour also persist with excel in-built formulas?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Excel formula is being calculated, can pre-saved excel be opened?<br />
I am working with Excel UDF (written in C#, returns array result) which takes lot of time. When udf is running,I am not able to open any existing excel sheet.</p>
<p>I want to confirm, whether there is problem with my udf or excel behaviour is like this with all udfs (to maintain formula consistency)? Is this behaviour also persist with excel in-built formulas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob van Gelder</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-16125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob van Gelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-16125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sige,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I dont own Office 97. I can&#039;t write VBA compatible with that version.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sige,</p>
<p>I dont own Office 97. I can&#8217;t write VBA compatible with that version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sige</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-16089</link>
		<dc:creator>Sige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-16089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is no compatible version for XL97?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run into an error upon loading the xla:&lt;br&gt;
Copile error in hidden module: modFormulaParser.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brgs Sige&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no compatible version for XL97?</p>
<p>I run into an error upon loading the xla:<br />
Copile error in hidden module: modFormulaParser.</p>
<p>Brgs Sige</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-14960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-14960</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rob,&lt;br&gt;
I just downloaded the program (Audxl 1.1) but can&#039;t seem to find out how to find and use it!&lt;br&gt;
Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,<br />
I just downloaded the program (Audxl 1.1) but can&#8217;t seem to find out how to find and use it!<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob van Gelder</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob van Gelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12482</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gary,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;True...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quite often I&#039;ll be faced with maintaining a horribly long formula which I didn&#039;t write.&lt;br&gt;
I believe you&#039;ve got to completely understand it&#039;s logic before refactoring. Hopefully the tool assists at that stage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
Rob&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>True&#8230;</p>
<p>Quite often I&#8217;ll be faced with maintaining a horribly long formula which I didn&#8217;t write.<br />
I believe you&#8217;ve got to completely understand it&#8217;s logic before refactoring. Hopefully the tool assists at that stage.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: refactor</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12478</link>
		<dc:creator>refactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12478</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice little add in!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a suggestion though ... whenever i see conditionals nested that deep its probably time to consider &quot;refactoring&quot; the formula ie. using a different technique to get the same result.  example using hlookup or vlookup ... the shorter the formula the easier to understand and the lower the likelihood of an error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cheers, Gary&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice little add in!</p>
<p>a suggestion though &#8230; whenever i see conditionals nested that deep its probably time to consider &#8220;refactoring&#8221; the formula ie. using a different technique to get the same result.  example using hlookup or vlookup &#8230; the shorter the formula the easier to understand and the lower the likelihood of an error.</p>
<p>cheers, Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob van Gelder</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob van Gelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12472</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;mschaef,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The formatting options are Constants at the top of the modFormatter module.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
Rob&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mschaef,</p>
<p>The formatting options are Constants at the top of the modFormatter module.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mschaef</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12467</link>
		<dc:creator>mschaef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a really nice piece of work. I have some issues with particular formatting decisions it makes, but formatting is a &#039;religous&#039; war anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really nice piece of work. I have some issues with particular formatting decisions it makes, but formatting is a &#8216;religous&#8217; war anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob van Gelder</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12455</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob van Gelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ola,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For your item 2:&lt;br&gt;
The method I used for parsing the formula is not intended for argument validation.&lt;br&gt;
I didn&#039;t take that path for two reasons :&lt;br&gt;
1. In Excel&#039;s formula bar you can use the mouse to select cells / ranges. Any attempt to replicate that function would be clunky and user unfriendly.&lt;br&gt;
2. I would need to work out all the valid argument types for all functions for all versions of Excel (even COM Add-Ins, UDF, XLL, etc...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I settled on the &quot;parse it blind&quot; method - based heavily on the approach taken by Eric W. Bachtal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On item 3:&lt;br&gt;
F9 does work within the Formatter window. Select part of the formula, press F9 and the result appears in the lower textbox.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
Rob&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ola,</p>
<p>For your item 2:<br />
The method I used for parsing the formula is not intended for argument validation.<br />
I didn&#8217;t take that path for two reasons :<br />
1. In Excel&#8217;s formula bar you can use the mouse to select cells / ranges. Any attempt to replicate that function would be clunky and user unfriendly.<br />
2. I would need to work out all the valid argument types for all functions for all versions of Excel (even COM Add-Ins, UDF, XLL, etc&#8230;)</p>
<p>So I settled on the &#8220;parse it blind&#8221; method &#8211; based heavily on the approach taken by Eric W. Bachtal.</p>
<p>On item 3:<br />
F9 does work within the Formatter window. Select part of the formula, press F9 and the result appears in the lower textbox.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ola Sandström</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2005/05/21/excel-formula-formatter-release/#comment-12452</link>
		<dc:creator>Ola Sandström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=1138#comment-12452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The perfect Formula tool would have 3 integrated windows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The Formula Formatter - to Read formulas&lt;br&gt;
2. The Function Arguments - to Edit formulas (linked to the Normal Edit/Insert Function button)&lt;br&gt;
3. The F9 button - to Evaluate formulas (shows actual values - better then the poor Evaluate formula)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read the formula in window 1. Click on the individual parts to edit in window 2 and at the same time window 3 shows all the values for the whole formula.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That would be perfect.&lt;br&gt;
Ola Sandström&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The perfect Formula tool would have 3 integrated windows:</p>
<p>1. The Formula Formatter &#8211; to Read formulas<br />
2. The Function Arguments &#8211; to Edit formulas (linked to the Normal Edit/Insert Function button)<br />
3. The F9 button &#8211; to Evaluate formulas (shows actual values &#8211; better then the poor Evaluate formula)</p>
<p>Read the formula in window 1. Click on the individual parts to edit in window 2 and at the same time window 3 shows all the values for the whole formula.</p>
<p>That would be perfect.<br />
Ola Sandström</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

