<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Formulas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=709#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting concept and i&#039;ve enjoyed playing around with it. However, it doesn&#039;t work so well when refering to multi-cell ranges of any kind. For example&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ColA  ColB  ColC&lt;br&gt;
1     =A1   =INDEX(B1:B3,2)&lt;br&gt;
1     2&lt;br&gt;
1     =A3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently the INDEX formula returns a value of 2. However if you apply your macro then the formula becomes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;=INDEX((A1):(A3), 2)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which changes the returned value to 1. Not really ideal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whilst I would trust myself recognise formulas where using this functionality would be dnagerous, I would hesitate before recommending it to everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fantastic to see new innovation like this though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dick,</p>
<p>This is an interesting concept and i&#8217;ve enjoyed playing around with it. However, it doesn&#8217;t work so well when refering to multi-cell ranges of any kind. For example</p>
<p>ColA  ColB  ColC<br />
1     =A1   =INDEX(B1:B3,2)<br />
1     2<br />
1     =A3</p>
<p>Currently the INDEX formula returns a value of 2. However if you apply your macro then the formula becomes:</p>
<p>=INDEX((A1):(A3), 2)</p>
<p>Which changes the returned value to 1. Not really ideal.</p>
<p>Whilst I would trust myself recognise formulas where using this functionality would be dnagerous, I would hesitate before recommending it to everyone.</p>
<p>Fantastic to see new innovation like this though.</p>
<p>Kind Regards</p>
<p>Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=709#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, I came across an interesting article in the Inside Excel periodical (november 2004 issue), where they were merging cells without loss of contents - In a way very similar to your build Formula. They had some interesting validation code. See Merge.zip at &lt;a href=&quot;http://download.elementkjournals.com/excel/200411/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://download.elementkjournals.com/excel/200411/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I came across an interesting article in the Inside Excel periodical (november 2004 issue), where they were merging cells without loss of contents &#8211; In a way very similar to your build Formula. They had some interesting validation code. See Merge.zip at <a href="http://download.elementkjournals.com/excel/200411/" rel="nofollow">http://download.elementkjournals.com/excel/200411/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Rynd</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rynd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=709#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This doesn&#039;t work if your formula references both A1 and A10 (the A10 gets replaced by (contents of A1)0, or A1 and AA1 (the AA1 gets replaced by A(contents of A1), or if your formula both references A1 and has the text &quot;A1? in a string.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You need to make sure that the characters before and after the cell reference are not letters or numbers, and that you&#039;re not inside a quoted string.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The parentheses are essential.  You didn&#039;t overdo it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t work if your formula references both A1 and A10 (the A10 gets replaced by (contents of A1)0, or A1 and AA1 (the AA1 gets replaced by A(contents of A1), or if your formula both references A1 and has the text &#8220;A1? in a string.</p>
<p>You need to make sure that the characters before and after the cell reference are not letters or numbers, and that you&#8217;re not inside a quoted string.</p>
<p>The parentheses are essential.  You didn&#8217;t overdo it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/08/04/building-formulas/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=709#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s very cool!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d have much use for it, but the concept is cool and I could see some people making use of it (rather than copying and pasting).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very cool!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d have much use for it, but the concept is cool and I could see some people making use of it (rather than copying and pasting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

