<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sort On More Than 3 Columns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/</link>
	<description>Daily posts of Excel tips…and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:39:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-58007</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-58007</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The REAL TIP is Kuba&#039;s 2nd tip on concatenating columns! Thanks, saved me a lot of work!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The REAL TIP is Kuba&#8217;s 2nd tip on concatenating columns! Thanks, saved me a lot of work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-18939</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-18939</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When sorting large number of columns I suggest concatenating them.&lt;br&gt;
For example, you have 10 columns to sort one by another. IN the 11th column deploy the concatenate(col1, col2, ...) function and then sort by this column only.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When sorting large number of columns I suggest concatenating them.<br />
For example, you have 10 columns to sort one by another. IN the 11th column deploy the concatenate(col1, col2, &#8230;) function and then sort by this column only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-18938</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-18938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The example is correct. The author says at the beginning that the table is to be sorted by &quot;...Country, Region, City&quot;. This and the screens are consistent with Bill&#039;s conclusion on CDE&amp;AB.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example is correct. The author says at the beginning that the table is to be sorted by &#8220;&#8230;Country, Region, City&#8221;. This and the screens are consistent with Bill&#8217;s conclusion on CDE&amp;AB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Doherty</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-18349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-18349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If I understand your example correctly, when sorting columns A.B.C.D.E, (E being the least important). I sort in this order E.D.C and then A.B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This did not work for my completely numeric Leader Board. Columns C and D were wrong&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorting C.D.E and then A.B. did&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand your example correctly, when sorting columns A.B.C.D.E, (E being the least important). I sort in this order E.D.C and then A.B.</p>
<p>This did not work for my completely numeric Leader Board. Columns C and D were wrong</p>
<p>Sorting C.D.E and then A.B. did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Ruzich</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-17440</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Ruzich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-17440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can you have more than two consecutive sorts?  When I try to sort a third time, the first two sorts are overwritten.  I seems to only work for the first two Data Sort boxes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you have more than two consecutive sorts?  When I try to sort a third time, the first two sorts are overwritten.  I seems to only work for the first two Data Sort boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-16967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-16967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David Gainer has reported that Excel 12 will sort on up to 64 criteria:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/26/474258.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/26/474258.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Gainer has reported that Excel 12 will sort on up to 64 criteria:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/26/474258.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/26/474258.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/archives/2004/06/23/sort-on-more-than-3-columns/#comment-16963</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/?p=651#comment-16963</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip, however I would of thought that excel would allow you sort sort by more than 3 columns, my old Amiga could do as many as you wanted and/or up to your memory limit. This is a seroius limit to large spreadsheets. I hope they sort it out in the next update.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, however I would of thought that excel would allow you sort sort by more than 3 columns, my old Amiga could do as many as you wanted and/or up to your memory limit. This is a seroius limit to large spreadsheets. I hope they sort it out in the next update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

